<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lumiera&#8217;s New Logo Concept &#8211; and a couple of suggested tweaks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.rfquerin.org/2009/01/03/lumieras-new-logo-concept-and-a-couple-of-suggested-tweaks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.rfquerin.org/2009/01/03/lumieras-new-logo-concept-and-a-couple-of-suggested-tweaks/</link>
	<description>If clever quips are my business, business is bad.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Nov 2011 17:42:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blathering on about creativity and an icon set &#124; Renaissance Man</title>
		<link>http://blog.rfquerin.org/2009/01/03/lumieras-new-logo-concept-and-a-couple-of-suggested-tweaks/comment-page-1/#comment-9004</link>
		<dc:creator>Blathering on about creativity and an icon set &#124; Renaissance Man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 18:08:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rfquerin.org/?p=851#comment-9004</guid>
		<description>[...] a longer term graphics project. I love diving into a variety of smaller projects, like the recent Lumiera logo entries, playing around with a gPodder logo and even more recently contributing a little of my play time [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] a longer term graphics project. I love diving into a variety of smaller projects, like the recent Lumiera logo entries, playing around with a gPodder logo and even more recently contributing a little of my play time&nbsp;[&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lumiera&#8217;s new logo concept - tweaks part deux &#124; Renaissance Man</title>
		<link>http://blog.rfquerin.org/2009/01/03/lumieras-new-logo-concept-and-a-couple-of-suggested-tweaks/comment-page-1/#comment-8967</link>
		<dc:creator>Lumiera&#8217;s new logo concept - tweaks part deux &#124; Renaissance Man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 14:00:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rfquerin.org/?p=851#comment-8967</guid>
		<description>[...] on the great constructive comments on my previous post from Thorsten and Troy about Lumiera&#039;s new logo concept, I thought I&#039;d make another slight tweak [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] on the great constructive comments on my previous post from Thorsten and Troy about Lumiera&#8217;s new logo concept, I thought I&#8217;d make another slight tweak&nbsp;[&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Troy James Sobotka</title>
		<link>http://blog.rfquerin.org/2009/01/03/lumieras-new-logo-concept-and-a-couple-of-suggested-tweaks/comment-page-1/#comment-8964</link>
		<dc:creator>Troy James Sobotka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 06:35:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rfquerin.org/?p=851#comment-8964</guid>
		<description>Good to finally see some people paying attention to typography.

The original logo is neither here nor there personally.  

The balance of the composition is the weakest chunk of it.  It could go a long way reducing the over abundant Free Software symmetry and scale the logo down.

The only truly unfortunate portion of the typography in the original is the awkward a and moderately awkward r.  The r feels a little incomplete when compared to the bowls and strokes of the other letters.  The a is borderline poorly crafted.

Generally when a design takes an established face a moderate twiddle is made upon it to turn it into a proprietary wordmark.  Neither of your two samples do this.  Perhaps it is worth experimenting with.

Finally, default tracking or kerning on type is often well down the road of not suitable for logo use.  For example, try trimming the tracking down on the left example you offered.  

Good to see these sorts of analysis ever more frequent in Free Software land...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good to finally see some people paying attention to&nbsp;typography.</p>
<p>The original logo is neither here nor there&nbsp;personally.  </p>
<p>The balance of the composition is the weakest chunk of it.  It could go a long way reducing the over abundant Free Software symmetry and scale the logo&nbsp;down.</p>
<p>The only truly unfortunate portion of the typography in the original is the awkward a and moderately awkward r.  The r feels a little incomplete when compared to the bowls and strokes of the other letters.  The a is borderline poorly&nbsp;crafted.</p>
<p>Generally when a design takes an established face a moderate twiddle is made upon it to turn it into a proprietary wordmark.  Neither of your two samples do this.  Perhaps it is worth experimenting&nbsp;with.</p>
<p>Finally, default tracking or kerning on type is often well down the road of not suitable for logo use.  For example, try trimming the tracking down on the left example you&nbsp;offered.  </p>
<p>Good to see these sorts of analysis ever more frequent in Free Software&nbsp;land&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thorsten Wilms</title>
		<link>http://blog.rfquerin.org/2009/01/03/lumieras-new-logo-concept-and-a-couple-of-suggested-tweaks/comment-page-1/#comment-8929</link>
		<dc:creator>Thorsten Wilms</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 12:42:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rfquerin.org/?p=851#comment-8929</guid>
		<description>Gentium is a beautiful font, but I think it is too soft here. The interaction of the open r an a strokes is very unfortunate.

mgOpen Cosmetica might be acceptable, but I would prefer something custom, fine-tuned ;)

The less flat frame seems to be a good idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gentium is a beautiful font, but I think it is too soft here. The interaction of the open r an a strokes is very&nbsp;unfortunate.</p>
<p>mgOpen Cosmetica might be acceptable, but I would prefer something custom, fine-tuned <img src='http://blog.rfquerin.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>The less flat frame seems to be a good&nbsp;idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

