Archives for category: photography

One of the things on my relatively short list to Santa this year was a new tripod. The one he brought me a few years back finally gave up the ghost when the plasticky knob thingy that tightens the plasticky pan head from rotating on its plasticky stem tore loose from its plasticky housing leaving a plasticky hole.

Now don’t get me wrong. I love Santa. And I used that tripod (though not nearly as often as I should have), but it was an entry level tripod not really suited for DSLR use. It was clearly more happy carrying a Flip camera or something of that ilk. Add to that its mid-level support braces and it just didn’t cut it for me. And bless his jolly old heart when he once again bought me a light-duty attractively priced store-brand tripod steeped in mid-level braced plasticky goodness. Clearly I just had to bite the bullet and exchange it.

So off I headed to the local camera shop on the day after Boxing Day determined to improve my situation. Initially, trying to be as price-conscious as possible, I was eyeing a slick little Manfrotto 785b travel tripod with a super-nifty looking pistol-grip head. Picking a display unit up and handling it, I quickly realized that its nifty pistol grip and skimpy legs felt a little too wobbly for my Canon 7D. So I decided to talk to a sales guy about my conundrum. I wasn’t about to exchange my sub-100 store-brand tripod for an 800 dollar Gitzo, but I wondered aloud if there was something a little more realistic for my situation.

Surprisingly, he told me there was. He picked out a relatively sturdy looking Dynatran AT-A102T carbon fibre tripod base and demonstrated it for me. Biting my lip, I asked him about the price. I told him I had wanted a ball-head for it, but he pointed me away from that solely on price. His logic being that he could pick out something that would work well with a 7D sort of weight and keep me at a reasonable price if I went with a 3-way pan head. Going to a ball head that would do a good job of supporting this sort of weight would be significantly pricier and it was something I could always upgrade to later. So he picked out a Dynatran ATH-04H aluminum pan head. He told me he could put that tripod and head together for $180.00. I was sold.

Now this may not be a pro-quality Manfrotto or Gitzo setup, but compared to what I walked in with, this was a huge step up. I may be way off base with this (and time will tell of course) but it seems to me that a carbon fibre tripod with a 17.5 lb load rating (the one I walked in with had a measly 6.6 lbs capacity) and a semi-decent aluminum pan head for 180 bucks is an alright deal.

I may do a proper review once I actually put this thing to use, but for now, here are a few photos of the new rig:

NB: The photos are in a superdy-duperdy lightbox display so if you’re reading via RSS you’ll likely have to hit the post directly to see them properly - ugh.

Dynatran AT-A102T Tripod

Dynatran AT-A102T Tripod

Top of Tripod

Top of the Tripod

ATH-04H Pan Head

ATH-04H 3-way Pan Head

Twist Leg Locks

Twist Leg Locks

Bag Hook

Bag hook for added weight and stability.

Compass and Level

Compass and Level

em_bunny

It isn’t every day that your surroundings provide you with wonderful soft light both from above and below. I took this shot a day or two ago during our walk through the forest. It was a fluke. And I simply love it. :)

Very proud of the way my daughter is playing soccer these days. No lack of effort for sure. I shot a couple of clips the other night with my Canon 7D using my 75-300 lens and edited them up quickly using Blender 2.5. The original was shot at 1280x720 at 60fps in manual mode with an aperture setting of 1/60 (thanks to Troy for that bit of advice) and then slowed down to 24fps on output from Blender.

I’m really thinking about getting a viewfinder loupe for my camera. I always forget my reading glasses when shooting and even with that nice 3” LCD screen, focus is clearly guesswork. It wasn’t too bad on most of these shots, but it can be frustrating. I’ve been thinking about the Zacuto Z-Finder, Lcdvf or Hoodman products to help solve this problem (note: Hoodman’s site is well.. extremely jarring in terms of design. Think Geocities meets Schoolbus. You’ve been warned. ;) ).

If anybody has experience with these things and how they perform, let me know.

No Lack of Hustle from Richard Querin on Vimeo.

Last night we had a mean set of thunderstorms roll through our area - the worst we’ve seen in quite a while.

In the midst of trying to get my daughter to settle down (blackouts are tremendous fun don’tcha know), I decided to dust off the tripod and have a little bit of fun. We did some quick and dirty light-writing with our flashlight, something I’ve seen many times, but never tried. Needless to say we did not reach perfection. With a 25sec shutter speed and a slightly flexible floor, you ain’t gonna cut yourself on the sharpness of those photos. But hey, it was fun, which is the point no?

lightwriting1

lightwriting2

I also got a nice photo of my daughter reading by lantern light. If you look closely to her right you’ll find Jessie, our Westie. At over 15 years old, he’s mostly deaf and pretty tired these days. He used to freak out at the slightly rumble, but slept quite soundly through the whole thing. :)

ReadingByLantern

eyestillBack in February or March, my trusty Flip Ultra camera stopped working. Granted, I wasn’t being all that careful with it, even thowing it into my coat pocket along with my car keys and other stuff. Shame on me really. I was disappointed that it died, under the manufacturer’s instructions I took out the batteries for 72 hours and hoped that a full cold reset would do it, but she was a no-go.

So facing a week long trip down to Myrtle beach at the end of March, I decided to buy another low cost video camera. I was looking at the Flip Mino, but it was nearly $300.00 up here and just didn’t look like something I should be spending all that money on. I was heading back to the Flip Ultra at $158.00 but then noticed that Best Buy was selling the Kodak Zi6 for about $168.00. It had significantly higher resolution than the Ultra and sounded like the build quality was a step above. I bought the Kodak, and a month later, I have to say I’m quite impressed.

The build quality does seem to be a significant step up from the Flip Ultra. It’s significantly heavier and wider but has a much larger LCD screen on the back and a much more durable feel to it. Slightly scared because of what I did to the poor Flip Ultra, the new camera has been shuttled back into it’s velour pouch every split second it’s not it use. Slightly paranoid I guess.

The Kodak shoots in (technically “HD”) 1280x720 at 30fps or at 60fps. It will also shoot in VGA (640x480 like the Flip Ultra), and it will take 3MP still shots. I have largely stuck with the 30fps 720p mode, but I’ve also taken a few stills which have not disappointed me too much either.

Clearly though, this is not a $1000 camcorder. I find the quality to be quite good, but it’s very lighting dependent. Although as many people I’ve discussed this with mention, almost any consumer camcorder loses significant quality in low light conditions. The Kodak is much the same and probably worse. I’ve used it happily indoors under normal lighting conditions, but of course like any handheld video camera (or still camera), it really shines when outdoors or under good natural lighting.

The camera is almost as simple as the Flip Ultra was. It has a nice flip out USB plug, and get’s detected in Linux as a mass USB storage drive. Very simple. It does let you fast-forward and rewind through videos under playback which is nice as well. Unlike the Flip Mino, this camera uses 2 AA batteries. And even nicer is the fact that for $168.00, they give you a nice pouch, two NiMH batteries AND a charger for them too! Yes, daddy.. indeed the batteries ARE included with this toy. However the SD card it stores video on was not. Luckily I had a 16GB SD card that my wife recently received at some company shindig. I never had a use for SD cards before this (my DSLR uses CF), so it was just good luck for her to have it at the same time I needed it.

Note also that the camera has a macros switch for close-up work. I’ve rarely used it, but I have included a still shot I took earlier today of my daughter’s eye. You can see it’s quite nice and you’ll notice the reflection of the Kodak right in there too. :)

It ain’t all rainbows and flying ponies though. There are two things which may cause a little concern…

First, the 1280x720 video is quite nice. Nice enough that it wouldn’t play back smoothly on my 5 year old P4 desktop system (even with a 7 series NVidia card). However on my new laptop (a Dell Studio XPS13) it plays back full screen just beautifully. So it may be great to shoot HD resolution video, but be aware that you may not be able to play it back in full resolution if your computer is getting somewhat long in the tooth. Once converted down to something smaller like 720x405, my P4 system played it no problemo.

Second, the video it produces is in MOV format. That is, it’s really h264 with AAC audio encoding. This is fine for many people. However if you’re interested in editing this video in Blender, you may want to re-encode the audio to something that the current stable version of Blender likes more (like MP3). You can do that using ffmpeg like this:

ffmpeg -i input.MOV -vcodec copy -acodec libmp3lame -ab 128k output.MOV

Blender will then happily accept the video and audio for editing.

I’ve included a few sample files in this blog post for those interested in evaluating the quality of the video and images. Note that the video sample is done under what might be the best quality light for a cheapy camera… overcast conditions. Your mileage will vary under more harsh lighting conditions. The camera is not lightning quick to in moving from dark to light spaces, but what do you really expect for a sub $200.00 video camera. The normal still shot is indicative of a tiny sensor. The light is fairly harsh so you’ll see a significant loss of detail. This won’t match a good 3MP point and shoot, but it might be better than your average cell-phone camera under these conditions.

I’ve included an original full res video clip (30 sec and about 30MB), another sample full res clip with the audio re-encoded to mp3 using ffmpeg above, one short macro video sample taken of the CD player display in my car (dust and scratches anyone?) and two sample full res images, one macro and one normal.

And although this didn’t play a part in my choosing the Kodak, I would be remiss if I didn’t point you to Troy Sobotka’s video which he shot with this Kodak Zi6 and edited in Blender. Just to show you what even a cheapie camera like this can do when in the right hands.

As I found with my Flip camera review way back when, there usually aren’t a lot of people willing to post a full res video sample, and I can’t see the usefulness in reviewing a camera and then posting a YouTube sample for people to evaluate. Hopefully it helps some people thinking about purchasing a cheapy video camera like this.

Full Resolution Original File (30MB, 30 sec)
Full Resolution File with audio encoded to mp3 instead of AAC (30MB, 30sec)
Full Resolution Macro Video sample (7MB, 8 sec)
Full Resolution Normal Shot
Full Resolution Macro Shot

The holiday season always seems to give me the much needed opportunity to take a lot of photographs. Mostly they’re snapshots, but now and again you get something impressive.

Once again I implore any DSLR owners to go out and purchase a fixed length, fast 50mm lens. I bought a 50mm f1.8 lens for my Canon 350D a while back and it almost always brings with it some impressive shots. Just set it to Aperture priority and use the widest aperture you have. This lens cost me just over 100 bucks (brand new) and I know Nikon produces a similar cheap but very useful fast prime lens too.

For those who don’t know, a wide aperture can give you a nice shallow depth of field. This is nice for portraits when you want the subject in focus, but the background nicely blurred. By chance I got one of my niece with some nice blurring of the Christmas tree lights (the fancy term for this blur is ‘bokeh’ btw). She’s eating jelly beans if you were wondering. ;) I really liked this shot and thought it was worthy of a post here.

Which reminds me how little I post about photography any more. In fact I don’t do nearly as much photography as I used to. I gotta get back in the habit. There’s a resolution for me I guess. Anyway, here’s the shot:

Back on our May long weekend, we decided to opt for conservative parenting and didn’t take our daughter to see the fireworks (too late and too little sleep we figured), but we made the promise that she’d definitely get to see them on Canada Day. So last night we went.

While Em, along with hundreds of other kids, unleashed their youthful joy in staying up late (she got to bed at 11:15pm), I took a few shots with my DSLR (f/8 aperture, 0.5” shutter speed and manual focus). They turned out okay considering that I slouched and used my chest as a makeshift tripod. You can see several decent ones in the embedded Flickr slideshow near the end of this post.

[note: for some reason, the embedded Flickr slideshow is not showing up in my post when it comes through an RSS aggregator - not in Google Reader anyway. So if you want to view the pictures you’ll have to visit the blog. If anyone else has embedded Flickr slideshows in their blog posts and wants to share some tips, please leave a comment - thanks!]

I also thought I’d try out my Flip Video camera in capturing some of the sights and sounds. I was pleasantly surprised at how well it did. Note that the audio sync delay is a result of the speed of sound, not the video encoding :)


Canada Day Fireworks - Tottenham, Ontario from Richard Querin on Vimeo.

I hope everyone had a great Canada Day. :)

If you’re interested in a super-slick way to browse images (on Flickr, Google Image Search, Picasa, Facebook or any of almost 20 different sites), and you’re using Firefox (Windows/Mac), Safari or even IE, then check out Piclens.

On my XP machine at work I’ve installed the Piclens add-on for FF3 (there’s one for FF2 as well btw), and I have to say I was blown away. Once you install the plugin and restart your browser, you’ll notice that when you hover over image thumbnails, you’ll now see a little triangular play button icon. Click that little icon and you will get a very smooth, very slick 3D navigation interface for the images on that page.

This is a great way to browse through Google Image search results or a Flickr photo stream. I’m absolutely amazed at what they are able to achieve with just a browser plugin.

What’s the catch?

Well, there isn’t yet a Linux compatible FF plugin, or an Opera add-on for that matter either. But it is a little bit heartening to see that this is one of their top feedback requests. At least we can assume they at least know that we Linux users want it.

So if you’re on a Windows box or a Mac (not sure if it will work in XP running in a VM on Linux) and you want to check out a really nice way to browse photos (or video thumbnails for that matter), check it out. You’ll be impressed.

I was in a Wal-Mart up here in Aurora Ontario this weekend, and while sauntering by the electronics section I saw a couple of Flip Video cameras on display for sale. The price was something close to $155.00 as I recall. Up until now I think the Flip Camera was sold exclusively in the States. Good news for fellow Canucks in the mood for a relatively cheap and decent quality video capture device.

You can read my mini-review and see video samples in the post I did about my new Flip Video Ultra camera a short time ago.

Browsing through the Flickr Group of You Look Nice Today (a podcast I’m a recently quite fond of), I came across a Geekiest photo pool.

If you are in need of a good and hearty laugh today, just browse that pool of photos. Especially this one posted by Chris Pirillo. Check out his dad’s ‘fro. It truly is a thing of beauty.

All I can say is thank God for flatbed scanners. :)